Before opposing counsel does.
Upload your case. Face a configured judge who interrupts with the questions you're dreading, and an AI opposing counsel who quotes your own exhibits against you — by voice or text. Then get the likely ruling, the failure point, and the fix.
A real run, replayed: a pro se plaintiff opposing summary judgment in a construction contract dispute. Watch the judge press, watch opposing counsel turn the plaintiff's own exhibit, watch the recovery. (Demonstration case — Harlan v. Meridian Build Group is fictional.)
Every word above is how the product behaves — the judge adapts to what you say, and counsel may only quote what is actually in your record.
When the hearing ends, the judge rules from the bench — honestly. Then a deeper model reviews the full transcript against your record and hands you this.
You led with abandonment doctrine before anchoring to Exhibit 12. The invoice is the case — it should have been your first sentence, not your recovery.
Credible on the documents, shaky on doctrine under pressure. Recovered well when pushed to the record — that instinct is the one to train.
Contracts, ledgers, declarations, discovery, court filings — the simulation is grounded in your actual documents, and only those.
Strict or patient, impatient or detail-obsessed. Set the jurisdiction, your side, and how hostile opposing counsel should be.
Speak out loud or type. The judge interrupts. Counsel objects and quotes your own exhibits back at you. Nobody follows a script.
Ruling, confidence, failure point, quote-by-quote fixes, and the prep list for the real thing. Then run it again — stronger.
An AI judge questions you while opposing counsel uses your documents against you in real time. Adaptive, never scripted.
Contracts, ledgers, declarations, discovery, court filings — processed into the evidentiary record the courtroom runs on.
Likely ruling, confidence %, weakest issue, and the exact fix — delivered after every simulation.
Voice mode creates real-time pressure. Courtrooms aren't typed — practice the way you'll perform.
Tracks the "um," "uh," and momentum-loss moments in your spoken argument, and shows you the count.
The judge applies the procedural and substantive law of your forum — and never invents a citation.
Strict, lenient, impatient, detail-oriented, openly skeptical, or a cold silent bench. Prepare for the judge you'll actually get.
Full text-driven simulation for late-night prep, accessibility, or preference. Same judge, same pressure.
Plain-language debriefs that explain what happened and why — without ever drafting your filings for you.
You don't get a moot court. You get one shot in front of a real judge. TrialPrepped is the rehearsal room the other side already has — the grilling, the objections, the trap questions — before any of it counts.
Moot a motion at midnight without calling in favors. Stress-test the weak point of your argument against a bench configured to hate it, and walk in already having lost the bad version once.
Join the waitlist for first access when TrialPrepped opens. No spam — one email when the doors open.